Clinical Evaluation of Non Resolving Dyspepsia by Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Diagnostic Perspective

Abstract

Introduction: Dyspepsia is a common problem in regular outpatient clinical practice. In Kashmir province of North India little research has been done on studying clinically important endoscopic findings in non resolving dyspeptic patients of different ages and ethnicities. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (UGIE) in patients with non resolving dyspepsia who had not undergone endoscopic evaluation previously. Aim: To determine the diagnostic value of endoscopy in patients with non resolving dyspepsia and to correlate the endoscopic findings with clinical perspective of patients with or without alarming symptoms and signs. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional, single-centre study was done in the Department of General Medicine, SKIMS Medical College and Hospital (tertiary care hospital), Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India, from July 2017 to June 2022. Study involved 1600 patients who presented with non resolving dyspepsia and underwent endoscopic evaluation. Non resolving dyspepsia was defined as persistent upper abdominal discomfort associated with heart burn or bloating after three to six weeks of adequate proton pump inhibitor therapy. Data was gathered and analysis was done based on demographics, clinical symptoms with or without alarming features by using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0. Results: A total of 1600 patients were incorporated in the study. The mean±Standard Deviation (SD) age of the study group was 52±10 years, and 63% of the patients were males. Epigastric pain was the predominant symptom (61%) followed by heartburn (22%). Abnormal endoscopic findings were noted in 47.75% of the patients involved in this study. Gastritis (19.4%) was the most common finding observed. Gastric carcinoma was the least common diagnosis, seen in 2.93% subjects mostly in the elderly age group. Conclusion: In the present study, patients with dyspepsia frequently had normal or clinically insignificant upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings regardless of age. Based on the present study conducted in a large number of patients invasive procedure like UGIE should be reserved for patients having definite alarming features as majority of patients don’t have clinically significant findings and should be treated adequately on Functional Dyspepsia (FD) protocol before a definitive investigative procedure is performed. The present study strongly indicates overuse of UGIE especially in the absence of alarming features.