3412 A standard protocol of biopsies during upper gi endoscopy (ugie) improve the diagnosis in patients with iron deficency anemia (ida).

Abstract

Endoscopists who investigate patients with IDA and no specific gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, usually make effort to identify a source of bleeding. About 38% of patients with IDA still have an unsolved problem (no detectable lesions D.C. Rockey `93) despite they had been submitted upper and lower GI endoscopy. Little emphasis has been put in considering iron malabsorption as an ethiological factor for IDA.Aim: determine the prevalence of gastric and duodenal diseases among patients with unexplained IDA that underwent to UGIE and the value of endoscopic alterations in selecting patients for biopsy. Methods: 150 consecutive patients (32 M, 118F) (median age 44, range 20-74) referred from the Hemathologic Dpt., with unexplained anemia, without GI symptoms and excluded for GI bleeding lesions were submitted to UGIE with a standard protocol of double biopsies of the fundus, antrum and duodenum. Endoscopic and histological findings were referred according to Sydney classification. Results:endoscopic findings: table 1. 21 (41%)out of the 51 pts with normal mucosa at endoscopy had normal fundus and duodenum at histology, 22 (43%) Cronic fundic Atrofic Gastritis (CGA) and 8 (16%) a Coeliac Disease (CD). 16 (20%) out of 80 CGA at histology were suspected at endoscopy. 12(57%) out of 21 CD at histology were suspected at endoscopy, but only 9(42.8) confirmed. Conclusions: Because CAG and CD were suspected at endoscopy only in (18.6%)pts while at histology were found in(67.3%), by routine biopsies in anemic patients, without any bleeding lesions, the number of diagnosis can be increased of 2.6 fold. Then, because the discrepancy between histology and endoscopic finding the latter cannot select patients for biopsy and a standard routine protocol of biopsie should be recommended in IDA patients. Endoscopists who investigate patients with IDA and no specific gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, usually make effort to identify a source of bleeding. About 38% of patients with IDA still have an unsolved problem (no detectable lesions D.C. Rockey `93) despite they had been submitted upper and lower GI endoscopy. Little emphasis has been put in considering iron malabsorption as an ethiological factor for IDA.Aim: determine the prevalence of gastric and duodenal diseases among patients with unexplained IDA that underwent to UGIE and the value of endoscopic alterations in selecting patients for biopsy. Methods: 150 consecutive patients (32 M, 118F) (median age 44, range 20-74) referred from the Hemathologic Dpt., with unexplained anemia, without GI symptoms and excluded for GI bleeding lesions were submitted to UGIE with a standard protocol of double biopsies of the fundus, antrum and duodenum. Endoscopic and histological findings were referred according to Sydney classification. Results:endoscopic findings: table 1. 21 (41%)out of the 51 pts with normal mucosa at endoscopy had normal fundus and duodenum at histology, 22 (43%) Cronic fundic Atrofic Gastritis (CGA) and 8 (16%) a Coeliac Disease (CD). 16 (20%) out of 80 CGA at histology were suspected at endoscopy. 12(57%) out of 21 CD at histology were suspected at endoscopy, but only 9(42.8) confirmed. Conclusions: Because CAG and CD were suspected at endoscopy only in (18.6%)pts while at histology were found in(67.3%), by routine biopsies in anemic patients, without any bleeding lesions, the number of diagnosis can be increased of 2.6 fold. Then, because the discrepancy between histology and endoscopic finding the latter cannot select patients for biopsy and a standard routine protocol of biopsie should be recommended in IDA patients.