Clinical Challenges in Managing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2: A Report From a Cross-sectional Survey.

Abstract

The aims of the study were to determine the management strategies offered to women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN 2) and the attitude of colposcopists toward its histological diagnosis and to identify the criteria used to select women for conservative management. Colposcopists working in Spain were invited to participate in an online questionnaire via the Spanish Gynecology and Colposcopy Societies. The survey included 42 questions covering the 3 objectives of the study. One hundred eighty-two colposcopists representing all autonomous regions in Spain responded. The response rate was 26.2%, considering the total number of members. Most colposcopists offer conservative management in selected cases (153/182). The preferred follow-up interval is 6 months (65%), followed by 3-4 months (30%). Observation was considered no longer appropriate after 24 months (29.5%) and 12 months (26.3%), and 24.3% expressed that it depended on women's plan to conceive. During conservative management, 93.9% always perform a cytology, 62.7% human papillomavirus testing, 96.8% colposcopy, 47.9% cervical biopsy, and 28.1% endocervical curettage. Forty-five percent consider that CIN 2 merely represents a misclassified CIN 1 or CIN 3, whereas 46.2% think that CIN 2 lesions are unlikely to regress. Most respondents considered that age older than 40 years (81.3%), human papillomavirus 16 infection (62.1%), HIV infection (76.8%), positive p16 immunostaining (60.2%), a large lesion occupying more than 50% of the cervix (87%), endocervical involvement (91.6%), and previous treatment for CIN 2-3 (77%) are contraindications for conservative management. Management of CIN 2 remains challenging for colposcopists, and a lack of consensus still exists in clinical practice. A better understanding of the natural history of CIN 2 and its clinical outcomes is still necessary to guide clinicians in its management.