Clinical and Hemodynamic Follow-up of a Patient After Operation for Dissection of an Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Secondary to Coarctation of the Aorta

Abstract

We present clinical follow-up of a 20-year-old male with an aortic aneurysm secondary to aortic coarctation. The diagnosis of aortic aneurysm secondary to aortic coarctation was made in 1997. The patient did not agree to undergo any invasive or therapeutic procedures at that time. He presented to an emergency unit with severe chest pain after chest trauma obtained during judo exercises in 1998. Two-dimensional echocardiography showed bicuspid aortic valves, an ascending aortic aneurysm 6 cm in diameter with an intimal flap and false lumen, aortic coarctation distal to the left subclavian artery, and aortic insufficiency secondary to annular dilatation. Type II aortic dissection was confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography, which showed the dissection was confined to the ascending aorta. The dissection extended to the beginning of the arcus aorta. Following stabilization of the patient's clinical condition, balloon coarctation angioplasty was performed to reduce afterload and hypertension and to facilitate femoral artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Surgical procedures included resection of the aortic valve and prosthetic valve implantation, resection of the ascending aorta, and interposition of a 22 mm Hamashied tubular vascular graft. At a follow-up visit 6 years later, the patient reported being easily fatigued and having palpitations. He had been suffering from hemolytic anemia and mild renal function impairment. Cardiac catheterisation and angiography showed a 40 mmHg gradient due to kinking of the aortic graft and no gradient at the coarctation site. We postulated the kinking of the aortic vascular graft may be related to an inappropriate vascular graft length. We also thought that the severe hemolysis was attributable to the disturbance of blood flow by a jet of blood at the site of the kinking aortic vascular graft. A second operation was performed because the renal function of the patient had decreased progressively and hemolysis symptoms increased. After the second operation, hemolysis on peripheral blood smears had disappeared and renal function had shown progressive improvements.