Abstract
Aim of study. Development in an anatomical experiment of a technique for operative access to the splenic and left renal veins during distal splenorenal bypass surgery with justification of the possibility of its successful application in clinical conditions.Material and methods. In the conditions of an anatomical experiment on 40 unfixed corpses of adults of both genders, objective volumetric and spatial indicators in surgical wounds were studied in two variants of exposure of retroperitoneal space vessels, as the first stage of distal splenorenal anastomosis. In clinical conditions in 40 patients with portal hypertension of various genesis, during the operation of distal splenorenal anastomosis, the wide exposure of the anterior surface of the pancreas, spleen, left renal veins and most of their branches was performed using the original method of partial left — sided medial visceral rotation, followed by an objective assessment of the volume-spatial parameters of access. Measurements were performed using a medical goniometer in relation to the mobilized areas of the left renal and splenic veins. Statistical processing of the study results was carried out using the method of variation statistics. To identify statistically significant differences, the Student’s t-test was used for disjoint samples.Results. An original method of operative access to the splenic and left renal veins was developed during the operation of distal splenorenal bypass by lifting the internal organs of the left flank of the abdominal cavity from the posterior abdominal wall and diverting them to the right. In the anatomical experiment in the original method of partial left-sided medial visceral rotation, all indicators were better (depth of the wound is less and the angles of operative activity and the inclination of the axis of operative activity — larger) than with a classic approach of intraoperative intraperitoneal access via transverse incision in the mesentery of the transverse colon. Despite the various variants of vascular architectonics and various anthropometric indicators of patients, there were no any forced refusal of distal splenorenal bypass surgery or unintentional damage to both the vessels themselves and the pancreas, specific complications associated with the implementation of the proposed operative approach to the vessels of the left retroperitoneal space, including damage to the spleen and ischemia of the descending colon, in any of 40 clinical cases.Conclusion. The suggested option of operative access to the splenic, left renal veins and their branches at the first stage of performing distal splenorenal anastomosis in patients with portal hypertension of various genesis provides convenient spatial relations in the operating wound; creates comfortable conditions for performing the main surgical technique — applying vascular anastomosis; has a minimal risk of developing specific complications associated with the approach to the vessels of the left retroperitoneal space.
Highlights
В ы во д Ключевые слова: Разработка в анатомическом эксперименте методики операционного доступа к селезеночной и левой почечной венам при операции дистального спленоренального шунтирования с обоснованием возможности ее успешного применения в клинических условиях
spatial indicators in surgical wounds were studied in two variants of exposure
most of their branches was performed using the original method of partial left
Summary
В ы во д Ключевые слова: Разработка в анатомическом эксперименте методики операционного доступа к селезеночной и левой почечной венам при операции дистального спленоренального шунтирования с обоснованием возможности ее успешного применения в клинических условиях. В клинических условиях у 40 пациентов с портальной гипертензией различного генеза во время операции дистального спленоренального анастомоза широкую экспозицию передней поверхности поджелудочной железы, селезеночной, левой почечной вен и большинства их ветвей выполнили по оригинальной методике частичной левосторонней медиальной висцеральной ротации с последующей объективной оценкой объемно-пространственных показателей доступа. Ни в одном из 40 клинических наблюдений, несмотря на различные варианты сосудистой архитектоники и различные антропометрические показатели пациентов, не было ни одного вынужденного отказа от дистального спленоренального шунтирования, ни одного непреднамеренного повреждения как самих сосудов, так и поджелудочной железы, и ни одного специфического осложнения, связанного с выполнением предлагаемого операционного подхода к сосудам левого забрюшинного пространства, в том числе повреждения селезенки и ишемии нисходящей ободочной кишки. УОД — угол операционного действия УОД дл — угол операционного действия по длине раны УОД шр — угол операционного действия по ширине раны ШР — ширина раны
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care"
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.