Abstract

Certain states of mind in a patient are difficult to remain with and tend to evoke defensive countertransference responses which, if enacted, obstruct therapeutic progress. The state of mind discussed in this paper is ‘adhesive identification’, a term that arose out of a conversation between Esther Bick and Donald Meltzer, when Bick said of certain patients: ‘They are sticky, they stick . . .’ The author presents an outline of ‘psychic skin’ defences (Bick, 1968, 1986; Briggs, A., 2002; Briggs, S., 1998; Mitrani, 2001; Turp, 2003) followed by a more detailed account of ‘adhesive identification’ (Meltzer, 1975). Cohen's (2003) work on countertransference and integrity, based on her experiences in a neonatal intensive care unit, is described. These resources are employed as a framework for thinking about countertransference enactments arising in psychoanalytic psychotherapy with an adult, adhesively attached patient. Extracts from a session with the patient, ‘Janine’, are presented and discussed. In conclusion, the author returns to the proposed links between integrity in the sense of thoughtfulness and respect and integrity in the sense of the felt experience of being in one piece within a skin boundary.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.