Abstract

Climate change has driven forest growth modellers to develop different climate sensitivity implementations (CSI) for their models. Among others, a model can rely on annual climate variables or average climate variables, such as 30-year normals. The novelty of this study was to develop a framework based on lifetime analysis to enable annual or average CSI in empirical models of tree mortality. Using this framework, we compared models of individual tree mortality based on an annual CSI with similar models relying on two average CSIs, one using interval-averaged climate variables, and the other, 30-year normals. We fitted these models to permanent-plot data of eight species in Ontario and tested the effects of summer and winter temperature as well as spring and summer precipitation in the models. Our results showed that the annual CSI was not superior to the average CSIs, but could be a valid alternative for some species. Warmer winter temperature was detrimental to the survival of Abies balsamea, Betula papyrifera, Picea glauca, and Pinus strobus, whereas greater spring and summer precipitation resulted in greater mortality occurrence for Picea mariana, Pinus banksiana, and Populus tremuloides. In most cases, the effects of climate variables were contrary to our initial hypotheses. We conclude that the effects of climate on tree mortality occurrence interact with other factors such as species distribution and ecophysiology.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.