Abstract

John Broome's book Climate Matters (Broome 2012) is a lucid and instructive discussion of a number of ethical questions about how we must respond to climate change. In this article, I examine his discussion of how the effects on future people of climate policies should bear on government decisions about whether to adopt those policies. In brief, Broome argues that the future effects of a government's climate policies are a matter of indifference as far as justice is concerned. These future effects are of relevance only because, and insofar as, governments have weaker duties of goodness (or beneficence). I argue that this position does not give sufficient importance to the future effects of climate policy. To rectify this position, I propose that we endorse a third type of duty that has implications for climate policy. This third duty is not directed at particular future individuals (as duties of justice are) and neither is it directed at producing as much impersonal good as possible (as duties of goodness are). Instead, it requires that governments respect the intrinsic value of human life.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.