Abstract

Large closed basins are often associated with regions of active tectonics. In contrast, we provide the example of the Great Divide Basin, in southern Wyoming, where climate change, through its impact on erosion and fl exure, provides the primary mechanism of basin closure. Two- and three-dimensional fl exural models that incorporate the effects of local basin abandonment due to aridity as well as minor extrabasinal extension demon- strate that basin closure with 40 m of base- ment relief (tilt) could have been achieved in the Great Divide Basin under reasonable assumptions of sediment rock density and fl exural rigidity. The primary drive for ba- sin abandonment was insuffi cient discharge that retarded river downcutting. Continued erosion in the surrounding drainage led to fl exural rebound, against which erosion by the outlet from the Great Divide Basin was unable to compete. Eventually, the basin became detached and isolated from the sur- rounding drainage, and a few tens of meters of differential tilt developed between the ba- sin fl oor and spillover point. An extra amount of tilt, up to a few meters, could have been at- tained by rift shoulder effects associated with minor nearby extension outside of the basin to the north. Hence, closure of the Great Di- vide Basin took place with no internal fault- ing, nor did it require any extrabasinal tec- tonic activity to force basin closure. Hence, basin closure and/or drainage reorganization need not record tectonic activity in all cases. Differential erosion provides an alternative hypothesis that does not refl ect local tectonic timing. Our model of the evolution of the Great Divide Basin illustrates a mechanism by which basins can become closed by cli- matic effects alone.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call