Abstract

Justice is a central concept in the international regime of climate change mitigation and adaptation and in proposals for the transition towards a low-carbon society. However, in documents on climate policy, the notion is seldom explicated in any detail. Research on environmental change has typically advanced specific and diverse visions of justice, and does not yet provide a comprehensive theoretical framework of different alternative notions. In this article, we present such a framework that incorporates 6 central conceptions of distributive justice and which indicates the relations between them. Based on in-depth interviews with a selected group of relevant actors in the debate on climate change in Finland—high-ranking professional politicians, leaders, researchers and activists—we study the interplay of environmental change and notions of justice. We show how articulations of justice can be connected with this framework, enabling the identification of their points of agreement and contention as well as their main lines of redefinition and transformation that stimulate acceptance and rejection of climate policy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call