Abstract
Classroom analysis of a packed bed reactor with and without the use of effectiveness factor (η) is discussed in this article. The use of (η) in the calculation of an isothermal packed bed reactor with convection and first-order reaction rate is analyzed. An analytical model has been developed with and without (η). The model without (η) was presented in a 50-min lecture and later used in a 50-min computational laboratory session with various groups of two students to calculate the length and catalyst mass in a packed bed reactor. In another class, the students calculated the model using (η). Four or five class activities were tested every month in pairs of students in the place of traditional exams. A questionnaire was prepared to verify the students’ level of difficulty in understanding two theoretical topics taught in the last two classes, difficulty in doing the requested calculations, as well as among calculations using the effectiveness factor and without it. We have included a question in the questionnaire on how the students felt about the elimination of one traditional monthly exam in Chemical Reactor Design. In the two semesters when the questionnaire was applied to the Chemical Reactor Design class, on average, 86% of the students preferred various class group activities as opposed to traditional exams, 80% of the students reported that they had little difficulty in understanding the two theoretical sections in the last two classes, 57% stated that they did not have any difficulty in doing the requested calculations and 51% reported that the calculation methods with the use of (η) and without its use were somewhat similar.
Highlights
In the two semesters when the questionnaire was applied to the Chemical Reactor Design class, on average, 86% of the students preferred various class group activities as opposed to traditional exams, 80% of the students reported that they had little difficulty in understanding the two theoretical sections in the last two classes, 57% stated that they did not have any difficulty in doing the requested calculations and 51% reported that the calculation methods with the use of (η) and without its use were somewhat similar
We investigated how the students felt about the elimination of traditional monthly exams in Chemical Reactor Design
The “mathematical trick” used in the present paper was the substitution of the concentration of component (A) on surface (CARp) with catalytic spherical particle with diffusion and reaction. (CARp) = F1CAf from Equation (29)
Summary
Chemical reaction engineering is one of the most important courses in chemical engi-. Stammitti (2013) selected three Transport Phenomena Laboratory experiments, namely metallic bar temperature profiles, transient heat conduction and fixed and fluidized bed performance, and developed a spreadsheet for each one These spreadsheets comprise analytical and numerical solutions of different models, as well as correlations available in the literature. Glassey, Novakovic, & Parr (2013) developed and delivered case studies in Stages 1 and 2 of a chemical engineering degree program by utilizing a number of different software packages. This dimensionless group provides a convenient measure of the promoting effect of a chemical reaction on the rate of absorption
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have