Abstract
At least since the advent of major industrialisation in the nineteenth century, there has been a notion of there existing two churches, one ‘urban’ and one ‘rural’. Since the 1970s, there has been a sporadic but not altogether unsuccessful attempt to test this proposition, and define the relative characteristics of both ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ church through analysis of official statistical data. Drawing upon the work of Francis [Francis, L. J. (1985). Rural Anglicanism: A future for young Christians? London: Collins Liturgical Publications] and Lankshear [Lankshear, D. W. (2001). One Church or three? Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Wales, Lampeter], the present study builds upon this tradition, offering a new model for defining ‘rural’ and ‘urban’ dioceses based upon 10 statistical factors. The results demonstrate the usefulness of the empirical approach to the formation of accurate definitions of the ‘rural’ and the ‘urban’. The study concludes by commending the 10-factor model for use by researchers concerned with developments in these areas.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.