Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of gender and postures of the neck, trunk, and knee on overall postural discomfort, and to classify combined postures into different postural discomfort groups. A total of 95 participants (42 males and 53 females) performed 45 different static postures, which were a combination of 3 neck angles, 5 trunk angles, and 3 knee angles, and rated the perceived postural discomfort. Non-hierarchical K-means cluster analysis was employed to classify the 45 different combined postures into several postural discomfort groups. Postural discomfort was significantly affected by gender and postures of the neck, trunk, and knee (p < 0.001). Three clusters (high, medium, and low discomfort) were identified and the postural discomfort was significantly different between clusters (p < 0.001). The high discomfort group consisted of mostly males with high knee and trunk flexion angles and a moderate neck flexion angle. The low discomfort group was female-dominant with low neck and trunk flexion angles and a moderate knee flexion angle. The different flexibility (stiffness) of the joint motions between genders may affect the gender difference in postural discomfort. The knee and trunk postures were critical to the postural balance, which may affect the perception of whole-body discomfort. This result will be useful for developing and improving postural observation tools.

Highlights

  • Awkward postures have been one of the primary components that are associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs)

  • Postural discomfort was significantly affected by the joint angles of individual body segments

  • This study evaluated the effect of gender, flexion angles of the neck, trunk, knee, and the combined postures on postural discomfort, and identified different postural discomfort patterns using cluster analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Awkward postures have been one of the primary components that are associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Typical postural assessment tools include rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) [5], rapid entire body assessment (REBA) [6], and the Ovako working-posture analyzing system (OWAS) [7]. The benefit of these tools is that they do not need specific equipment and can be practically used in the field. One drawback is that coordination between body segments is not thoroughly considered when computing the final score [3]. This could under- or overestimate the demand from whole-body postures

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call