Abstract

In this chapter I address the potential contradiction between the goals and institutional means associated with global civil society (GCS) and the accomplishments of traditional nation-state-based institutions with regard to what I term civic literacy. The level of civic literacy, simply put, corresponds to the proportion of a society’s citizens capable of informed political participation. High civic literacy, I argue, contributes to social improvement especially by empowering those at the bottom. The fundamental question is whether we can imagine global institutions and organizational actors that would reproduce, at the transnational level, outcomes associated with high civic literacy that are still today attained through institutions based on nation-states. I argue that we cannot, and that, in their emphasis on global organizational action, GCS activists and thinkers acutely underestimate, and thus risk helping to undermine, the organizational nexus provided by national political arenas and outcomes associated with them.KeywordsWelfare StateNordic CountryAdult EducationDaily NewspaperCivic EducationThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.