Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and the role of pharmacogenetic testing.

Abstract

A 10-year-old white male presented with a chief complaint of swelling and pain in the left distal femur that worsened when he participated in sports at school. After several weeks of continued pain and swelling an x-ray was performed and revealed the presence of a large mass. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a large primary bone tumor located on the left femur, and open biopsy subsequently confirmed the diagnosis of osteosarcoma. The tumor was 9 cm long in the axis and 7 cm in diameter. Further tests revealed that the disease was localized to that area. The patient weighed 36 kg and was 145 cm tall at the time of diagnosis, placing him in the 75th percentile for age and sex. The patient was started on chemotherapy based on a standard Children’s Oncology Group (COG) treatment protocol of high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. He received cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2 approximately every 5 weeks for a total of 4 treatments. For each treatment, cisplatin 60 mg/m2/day was administered via intravenous infusion on 2 consecutive days. Based on the patient’s body surface area of 1.2 m2, he received a cumulative dose of 576 mg of cisplatin (480 mg/m2). He was also placed on an appropriate antiemetic regimen per COG protocol. He was not on any other medications known to cause ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity. His renal function was normal at baseline and all subsequent lab tests thereafter. Genotyping for thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) mutations was not performed prior to initiation of cisplatin therapy. Standard audiometric monitoring was performed prior to administration of the first cisplatin dose, and the results were all within the normal range (Brock Grade 0 [Table]).1 The patient completed the full cisplatin treatment course, and audiometric monitoring was performed prior to administration of the second and third cisplatin treatments with no significant hearing impairment noted. On follow-up 2 months after completing the third treatment course, the patient reported having trouble hearing. The loss manifested initially as bilateral tinnitus and ultimately progressed to bilateral hearing loss. Audiometric monitoring performed at this visit revealed moderate to severe hearing loss, defined as a Brock score ≥2 (Table). This translates to educationally significant hearing loss presumed to be caused by the ototoxic effects of cisplatin. Hearing tests performed 6 months and 1 year later revealed that the patient’s hearing had declined slightly but remained in Brock Grade 2, suggesting that the initially observed hearing deficit was likely progressive and irreversible.