P798 Study of the concordance between the enzymatic activity of Thiopurine S-methyltransferase and polymorphisms in the TPMT gene in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Abstract

Abstract Background Thiopurine therapy is associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is the enzyme responsible for metabolism, and its determination helps identify patients at risk of toxicity. This study aims to explore the level of correspondence between the TPMT genotype and enzymatic activity (phenotype) with the objective of preventing adverse events prior to the commencement of thiopurine therapy. Methods Consecutive patients with IBD, Crohn’s Disease (CD) or Ulcerative Colitis (UC), were included. Genotype was conducted for the most prevalent TPMT variants (TPMT*2, TPMT*3B, TPMT*3C), TPMT enzymatic activity assessment, and quantification of 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) levels. Adverse effects were documented, along with the administration of biologics, mesalazine, ACE inhibitors or allopurinol. The primary objective was to evaluate the concordance between TPMT genotype and phenotype. Secondary objectives included determining the prevalence of genotype and phenotype within our patient cohort, 6-TGN serum levels, the prevalence of adverse events and identifying potential pharmacological inducers of the phenotype. Results A total of 218 patients were included (131 with CD and 81 with UC). Thirteen patients did not initiate thiopurines, and 34.63% (71/205) had discontinued treatment. The most observed adverse events were myelotoxicity (15.12%), gastrointestinal toxicity (12.20%), and hepatic toxicity (5.37%). TPMT activity exhibited a trimodal distribution, with 87.61% (191/218) having normal activity, 11.47% having intermediate activity, and 1% having low activity. Genotypically, 90.83% (198/218) had a wild-type genotype, 8.72% (18/218) had a heterozygous genotype, and 0.5% (1/218) had a homozygous genotype. The concordance index between phenotype and genotype was calculated at 0.57. Significantly, myelotoxicity was associated with the presence of genotypic variants (p=0.004). 6-TGN levels did not correlate with TPMT activity and concurrent medications did not affect TPMT activity . Conclusion The proactive assessment of TPMT (phenotype or genotype) before initiating thiopurine therapy effectively mitigates the occurrence of myelotoxicity in IBD patients. Importantly, the level of concordance between TPMT activity and genotype is moderate, with genotyping serving as the more reliable approach for preselecting patients susceptible to myelotoxic reactions.