Abstract

The paper analyses, in a comparative perspective, both the similarities and the differences of the intellectuals, gathered by the Partisan Review, and the Paulistas, gathered by the Clima magazine. Being heirs to the modernist legacy, familiarized with cultural cosmopolitanism, and aware of the intellectual and artistic local production, they took the stage in the Paulista and cultural scene in the 1940's and 1950's. The latter could also renovate the discussion on the relationship between modernism in the arts and radicalism in politics. As both intellectuals and writers, they were distinct from the academics in the strict sense. As critics and reviewers, they made the essay their expression means by excellence, finding in the New Yorker literary and political magazines their institutional forum. At the same time similar and distinct to the Clima Paulistas, they provide a reasonable counterpoint to go deeper in the investigation of the intellectual life in Sao Paulo in that period. That will be done if we, above all, are able to advance over the investigative scope of prevailing sociological problems aside the recuperation of the particularities of the cultural and intellectual history of the cities of New York and Sao Paulo, in order to deepen the comparative perspective.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.