Abstract

BackgroundA Worldwide Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Urticaria (CU) patient Evaluation (AWARE) is a non-interventional, multicenter study including patients from Europe, Central and Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and the Middle East. AWARE describes real-world evidence for CU, including clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and the impact on quality of life. MethodsOver the 2-year study, therapy changes, angioedema occurrence, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded over 9 visits, including dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7). Data were stratified into subgroups: chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), or CSU + CIndU. ResultsOut of 4838 patients analyzed, 9.9% were receiving no treatment for their CU symptoms at baseline, and 20.4% were receiving first-line non-sedating H1-antihistamine at approved doses. The predominant baseline therapy was up-dosed non-sedating H1-antihistamines (25.5%). By Visit 2, omalizumab was the overall most commonly used therapy (29.6%), increasing to 30.1% by the end of the study. Baseline DLQI scores for patients with CSU, CIndU and CSU + CIndU were 8.3, 7.6 and 9.1, respectively; scores decreased over the study for CSU and CSU + CIndU patients, but fluctuated for CIndU patients. Baseline angioedema occurrence was higher in CSU and CSU + CIndU patients, reported in 45.4% and 45.5% of patients, respectively, compared to 17.0% in CIndU patients. By the final visit, angioedema had decreased to 11.9% and 11.2% for CSU and CSU + CIndU, respectively, and 9.6% for CIndU. ConclusionCU patients are undertreated at baseline; after entering the AWARE study, more patients received appropriate treatment. However, over two thirds are not escalated to third-line treatments.

Highlights

  • Chronic urticaria (CU) is a heterogeneous group of skin diseases characterized by the rapid and recurrent appearance of itchy wheals, angioedema, or both, for longer than 6 weeks.[1]

  • Out of 4838 total patients, 480 (9.9%) patients were receiving no treatment for their Chronic Urticaria (CU) symptoms at baseline, and only 986 (20.4%) were receiving the recommended first-line non-sedating H1-antihistamine at approved doses

  • The proportion of patients either on no treatment, first, second or third-line treatments did not differ between baseline (77%) and the end of the study (77.8%; Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a heterogeneous group of skin diseases characterized by the rapid and recurrent appearance of itchy wheals, angioedema, or both, for longer than 6 weeks.[1]. CSU is characterized by the spontaneous occurrence of wheals and/or angioedema, is more common than CIndU, and accounts for approximately two-thirds of CU cases.[2] In CIndU, specific triggers such as cold temperatures induce wheals and angioedema (cold urticaria).[3] Around 20% of patients with CU have a combination of CSU and CIndU (CSU þ CIndU).[4] With a point prevalence of 0.5–1% and a peak incidence in individuals between 20 and 40 years of age,[2] CU is a common disorder that has a profound impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL).[5,6,7]. AWARE describes real-world evidence for CU, including clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and the impact on quality of life

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.