CHOICE OF FORUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH

Abstract

AbstrakUU No.3 of 2006 regarding Amendment of UU NO.7 of 1989 regardingReligion Court (Peradilan Agama) give the additional authority to theReligion Court, for examine, decide, and resolute dispute Syaria banking.While UU No.21 of 2008 regarding Syaria Banking decides that a dispute insyaria banking can be resoluted at Religion Court also can be resoluted atGeneral Court (Peradilan Umum). This of course can create a Choice ofForum. Therefore it needs to be examine what are the method and thedispute resolution type of syaria banking? And if the "Lex posterioriederogate lex priorie" principle and "lex specialis derogate lex generalis "principle can be used in Choice of Forum resoluting a dispute in syariabanking? From Ihe examinalion result can be delermine that the method andthe type of dispute resoluting of syaria banking according to UU No. 3 of2006 and UU No.21 of 2008 can be used through the litigation process, inReligion Court and General Court. Besides through the litigation processalso can be performed from the non-litigate process, discussion, bankingmediation, through Basyarnas or other arbitrate institution and alternativedispute resolution with the regulation not against the syaria principal. The"lex posteriorie derogate lex priorie " principle and "the lex specialisderogate lex generalis" principle cannot be used in Choice of Forumresoluting a dispute in syaria banking.