Abstract

SUMMARY. — In 1661 Boyle presented a dialogue making use of a skeptical line of reasoning. His purpose thereby was, on the negative side, to criticize Aristotelian and Paracelsian definitions of chemical objects and, on the positive side, to establish a new methodology in chemistry that conformed to the requirements of experimental philosophy, while avoiding a Cartesian-style reduction. To acquire the status of a science, chemistry had to reform its explanatory concepts and its experimental methods, as physics had done at the beginning of the century. In spite of its dubitative style, The Sceptical chymist represents a crucial moment in the history of modern chemistry.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.