Abstract
Although children are overall sensitive to inequality and prefer fair allocation of resources, they also often display ingroup favouritism. Inquiring about the factors that can shape the tension between these two driving forces in children, we focused on the role of parents. Extending the limited literature in this field, the present work examined whether individual differences in 3-to 11-year-old White children’s (N = 154, 78 boys) evaluations of fair versus pro-ingroup behaviours in an intergroup context vary as a function of both mothers’ and fathers’ social dominance orientation (SDO), right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and moral foundations. Parents completed a questionnaire. Children were presented with a scenario in which two ingroup members distributed candies to two other children, one White and one Black, either in an egalitarian way or displaying a clear ingroup favouritism. Afterwards, their attitudes towards the two ingroup members who had distributed the candies were assessed through both an Implicit Association Test and explicit questions. Although children displayed on average an explicit preference for the fair over the pro-ingroup target, this preference did not emerge at the implicit level. Most importantly, both children’s explicit and implicit attitudes were related to mothers’ SDO, indicating that at increasing level of mothers’ SDO children’s inequality aversion tended to drop. Overall, these results emphasize the relevance of mothers’ support for social hierarchy in relation to the way in which children balance the two competing drives of equality endorsement and pro-ingroup bias.
Highlights
Previous research has clearly shown two overall tendencies in the way children appraise distributive behaviours
We will focus on the latter aspect and, on how the relative evaluation of ingroup peers who behave in an egalitarian versus pro-ingroup way is related to mothers’ and fathers’ authoritarian dispositions and moral foundations
Based on research suggesting that moral foundations merely reflect political ideology, rather than the reverse [52,53,54,55, 57, 58], we explored whether a specific pattern linking parents’ individualizing and binding moral foundations and children’s responses could be identified or, alternatively, parents’ social attitudes associated to right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) represent more powerful predictive constructs
Summary
Previous research has clearly shown two overall tendencies in the way children appraise distributive behaviours. Children are sensitive to the relative amount of resources that the various recipients obtain, strongly preferring a fair allocation of resources [e.g., 1, 2]. This phenomenon reflects a general inequality aversion. In intergroup contexts there is often a tension between two driving forces: A norm towards egalitarianism and a bias in favour of one’s own social group This applies both in relation to the way children personally distribute resources and in relations to the evaluation of peers who are involved in the distribution of resources in intergroup settings. We will focus on the latter aspect and, on how the relative evaluation of ingroup peers who behave in an egalitarian versus pro-ingroup way is related to mothers’ and fathers’ authoritarian dispositions and moral foundations
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
