Abstract

Exposure to a father's violence against the mother during childhood entails a risk for emotional and behavioral problems and for reproducing violent behavior. More knowledge about how children make sense of the contradictory aspects of fathers' violence may help us understand variations in children's reactions. This qualitative study aims to contribute to theoretical development by identifying patterns in how children can relate general conceptions of fathers to general conceptions of violence to create conciliated meaning about their own father's violence against their mother. Ten children, aged 8 to 12, were interviewed using a semistructured format. Analysis of their abstractions and generalizations of concepts crucial for meaning‐conciliation resulted in the identification of three patterns of meaning: 1) acknowledging the violent father as one kind of father, 2) acknowledging the father's violent behavior as one part of his multifaceted personality, and 3) distancing violence from fathers' relative goodness. Implications of the findings for social theory and child welfare praxis are suggested.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.