Abstract
ABSTRACT The relative fit of two nested models can be evaluated using a chi-square difference statistic. We evaluate the performance of five robust chi-square difference statistics in the context of confirmatory factor analysis with non-normal continuous outcomes. The mean and variance corrected difference statistics performed adequately across all conditions investigated. In contrast, the mean corrected difference statistics required larger samples for the p-values to be accurate. Sample size requirements for the mean corrected difference statistics increase as the degrees of freedom for difference testing increase. We recommend that the mean and variance corrected difference testing be used whenever possible. When performing mean corrected difference testing, we recommend that the expected information matrix is used (i.e., choice MLM), as the use of the observed information matrix (i.e., choice MLR) requires larger samples for p-values to be accurate. Supplementary materials for applied researchers to implement difference testing in their own research are provided.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.