Abstract

BackgroundBesides airway suctioning, patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV) benefit of different combinations of chest physiotherapy techniques, to improve mucus removal. To date, little is known about the clearance effects of oscillating devices on patients with acute respiratory failure undergoing iMV. This study aimed to assess (1) the effects of high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) on lung aeration and ventilation distribution, as assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT), and (2) the effect of the association of HFCWO with recruitment manoeuvres (RM).MethodsSixty critically ill patients, 30 classified as normosecretive and 30 as hypersecretive, who received ≥ 48 h of iMV, underwent HFCWO; patients from both subgroups were randomized to receive RM or not, according to two separated randomization sequences. We therefore obtained four arms of 15 patients each. After baseline record (T0), HFCWO was applied for 10 min. At the end of the treatment (T1) or after 1 (T2) and 3 h (T3), EIT data were recorded. At the beginning of each step, closed tracheobronchial suctioning was performed. In the RM subgroup, tracheobronchial suctioning was followed by application of 30 cmH2O to the patient’s airway for 30 s. At each step, we assessed the change in end-expiratory lung impedance (ΔEELI) and in tidal impedance variation (ΔTIV), and the center of gravity (COG) through EIT. We also analysed arterial blood gases (ABGs).ResultsΔTIV and COG did not differ between normosecretive and hypersecretive patients. Compared to T0, ΔEELI significantly increased in hypersecretive patients at T2 and T3, irrespective of the RM; on the contrary, no differences were observed in normosecretive patients. No differences of ABGs were recorded.ConclusionsIn hypersecretive patients, HFCWO significantly improved aeration of the dorsal lung region, without affecting ABGs. The application of RM did not provide any further improvements.Trial registrationProspectively registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (www.anzctr.org.au; number of registration: ACTRN12615001257550; date of registration: 17th November 2015).

Highlights

  • Besides airway suctioning, patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation benefit of different combinations of chest physiotherapy techniques, to improve mucus removal

  • Thirty normosecretive and 30 hypersecretive patients were enrolled between December 2015 and June 2016

  • electrical impedance tomography (EIT) parameters did not differ between patients randomized to receive or not recruitment manoeuvres (RM) (Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV) benefit of different combinations of chest physiotherapy techniques, to improve mucus removal. Little is known about the clearance effects of oscillating devices on patients with acute respiratory failure undergoing iMV. The presence of an endotracheal tube impairs the bronchial mucus velocity transport in anaesthetized dogs [2]; in critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV), it seriously impairs cough reflex and mucociliary escalator function [3, 4], promoting the accumulation of tracheobronchial secretions, leading to sequestration and densification of secretions in the lower airways and increasing the risk of pneumonia [5] and lung atelectasis [6]. Little is known about their effects on patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) undergoing iMV

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call