Abstract

Replication studies are essential for evaluating the validity of previous research findings. However, it has proven challenging to reproduce the results of ecological and evolutionary studies, partly because of the complexity and lability of many of the phenomena being investigated, but also due to small sample sizes, low statistical power and publication bias. Additionally, replication is often considered too difficult in field settings where many factors are beyond the investigator’s control and where spatial and temporal dependencies may be strong. We investigated the feasibility of reproducing original research findings in the field of chemical ecology by performing an exact replication of a previous study of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella). In the original study, skin swabs from 41 mother-offspring pairs from two adjacent breeding colonies on Bird Island, South Georgia, were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Seals from the two colonies differed significantly in their chemical fingerprints, suggesting that colony membership may be chemically encoded, and mothers were also chemically similar to their pups, hinting at the possible involvement of phenotype matching in mother-offspring recognition. In the current study, we generated and analyzed chemical data from a non-overlapping sample of 50 mother-offspring pairs from the same two colonies 5 years later. The original results were corroborated in both hypothesis testing and estimation contexts, with p-values remaining highly significant and effect sizes, standardized between studies by bootstrapping the chemical data over individuals, being of comparable magnitude. However, exact replication studies are only capable of showing whether a given effect can be replicated in a specific setting. We therefore investigated whether chemical signatures are colony-specific in general by expanding the geographic coverage of our study to include pups from a total of six colonies around Bird Island. We detected significant chemical differences in all but a handful of pairwise comparisons between colonies. This finding adds weight to our original conclusion that colony membership is chemically encoded, and suggests that chemical patterns of colony membership not only persist over time but can also be generalized over space. Our study systematically confirms and extends our previous findings, while also implying more broadly that spatial and temporal heterogeneity need not necessarily negate the reproduction and generalization of ecological research findings.

Highlights

  • Replication studies are fundamental to the scientific process as they are essential for evaluating the correctness of scientific claims and the conclusions of other scientists (Schmidt, 2009)

  • Study site and fieldwork Chemical samples were taken from six Antarctic fur seal breeding colonies on Bird Island, South Georgia (5400′S, 3802′W) during the peak of the 2016 breeding season (November–December; the previous study was conducted during the peak of the 2011 breeding season)

  • In order to investigate the reproducibility of chemical patterns of colony membership and mother-offspring similarity in Antarctic fur seals, we analyzed chemical data from mother-offspring pairs from special study beach (SSB) and freshwater beach (FWB) as well as pups from an additional four breeding colonies around Bird Island (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Replication studies are fundamental to the scientific process as they are essential for evaluating the correctness of scientific claims and the conclusions of other scientists (Schmidt, 2009). Quasi and conceptual replications are important because they can shed light on the generality ( known as “transportability”) of the effects under investigation (Goodman, Fanelli & Ioannidis, 2016; Dirnagl, 2019; Piper et al, 2019; see Kelly, 2006) Put another way, it is only possible to learn something about the broader significance of a certain effect by probing to what extent it persists in settings that are different from, or which lie outside of the experimental framework of the original study. Quasi and conceptual replications play an important role in increasing the “external validity” of results (Schmidt, 2009)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.