Chemical Constituents of Cinnamomum rupestre and Cinnamomum nanophyllum

Abstract

Cinnamomum rupestre Kosterm. (Lauraceae) is an endemic species in the Philippines originally discovered in Palawan [1], while Cinnamomum nanophyllum Kosterm. is a widespread endemic species in the country. In Cebu, the local people collect and prepare the leaves and the bark as a decoction for relief of stomach and abdominal ailments. There are no reported chemical and biological studies on C. rupestre and C. nanophyllum. These are two of the 21 species of Cinnamomum found in the Philippines, of which 16 are known to be endemic [1]. This study was conducted as part of our research on the chemical constituents of Cinnamomum species found in the Philippines. We earlier reported the isolation of eugenol and safrole from the bark, polyprenol from the leaves, and trilinolein from the roots of Cinnamomum cebuense [2]. Silica gel chromatography of the dichloromethane (DCM) extract of the bark of C. rupestre afforded 4 -hydroxy5,7,3 -trimethoxyflavan-3-ol (1), 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamaldehyde (2), and 4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol or eugenol (3), while the leaves yielded -sitosterol (4). The structure of 1 was elucidated by extensive 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy and confirmed by comparison of its 13C NMR data with those reported in the literature for 4 -hydroxy-5,7,3 -trimethoxyflavan-3-ol (1) [3]. The structures of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamaldehyde (2) [4], 4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol or eugenol (3) [5], and -sitosterol (4) [6] were confirmed by comparison of their 13C NMR data with those reported in the literature. The DCM extract of the bark of C. nanophyllum afforded 1, 2, 4, and trilinolein (5), while the leaves yielded 4. The structure of trilinolein (5) [7] was confirmed by comparison of its 13C NMR data with those reported in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the chemical constituents of C. rupestre and C. nanophyllum. The bark and leaves of Cinnamomum rupestre and Cinnamomum nanophyllum were collected from Hagnaya, Carmen, Cebu, Philippines in June 2010. Voucher specimens of Cinnamomum rupestre and Cinnamomum nanophyllum were authenticated by one of the authors (EMGA) and deposited in the De La Salle University-Manila Herbarium (DLSU-3101 and DLSU-3102, respectively). The air-dried bark and leaves of C. rupestre were chopped into small pieces and then air dried. The air-dried bark (371.8 g) and leaves (89.1 g) were soaked in DCM for 3 days and then filtered. The filtrates were concentrated under vacuum to afford the crude extracts of bark (16.6 g) and leaves (7.0 g), which were fractionated by silica gel chromatography using increasing proportions of acetone in DCM (10% increment by volume) as eluents. The DCM fraction from the bark was rechromatographed in petroleum ether (7 ) to afford 3 (28 mg). The 30% acetone in DCM fraction was rechromatographed with 12.5% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether as eluent to afford 2 (18 mg). The 40% acetone in DCM fraction was rechromatographed (5 ) in DCM, then (8 ) in diethyl ether–acetonitrile–DCM (0.5:0.5:9) to afford 1 (12 mg). The DCM fraction from the leaves was rechromatographed (3 ) in 5% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether to afford 4 (10 mg). The air-dried bark and leaves of C. nanophyllum were chopped into small pieces and then air dried. The air-dried bark (493.5 g) and leaves (49.5 g) were soaked in DCM for three days and then filtered. The filtrates were concentrated under vacuum to afford the crude extracts of bark (8.0 g) and leaves (9.5 g), which were fractionated by silica gel chromatography using increasing proportions of acetone in DCM (10% increment by volume) as eluents. The crude DCM extract of the bark of C. nanophyllum was chromatographed in increasing proportions of acetone in DCM at 10% increment as eluents. The 10%