Abstract

Cheating is an academically dishonest behavior about which there has been a thrust of research. However, it has not been extensively researched in an Iranian context. Therefore, the current study was conducted with 310 Iranian students. A cheating questionnaire was devised and administered to the participants. Certain demographic variables were investigated. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze the obtained data. The results of the descriptive statistics revealed that cheating was common among participants, and most students did not harbor any negative attitude toward cheating or at least were neutral about it. The most common method of cheating was “letting others look at their papers while taking exams.” The most common reason for cheating was “not being ready for the exam.” As for inferential statistics, one-way analysis of variance, an independent t-test, and correlational analyses were used to test the effect and relationship of demographic variables on and between the cheating behaviors of the participants. It was found that none of the two demographic variables of gender and year level had any effect on students’ cheating behaviors. Furthermore, achievement scores and age were not significantly correlated with cheating behavior scores.

Highlights

  • Background of the StudyCheating is an academic dishonesty (Colnerud & Rosander, 2009) that is rampant in university milieu

  • Bahrami et al (2015) conducted a study with medical sciences students, and the findings revealed that 45% of students experienced cheating

  • In terms of the second item about cheating which linked cheating to religious beliefs, 53.6% believed that religion had a role in not cheating

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cheating is an academic dishonesty (Colnerud & Rosander, 2009) that is rampant in university milieu. It is taking place at so alarming a rate that it has prompted research worldwide. Cheating studies explored cheating as a dependent variable, which lends itself to subcategories like “reasons for cheating,” “reasons for not cheating,” “methods of cheating,” and “attitudes toward cheating.”. Some reasons such as “uselessness of the materials” and “not being ready” have been nominated as the primary reasons for cheating. It is a truism that if students do not harbor negative attitudes toward cheating, it might mean that they are involved in one way or the other in the act of cheating

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call