Abstract

Most of the water supplied in Brazil comes from water streams that may have higher values for apparent color than turbidity. Treatability trials were performed for color and turbidity removal to evaluate the advantages of coagulation during the charge neutralization mechanism when compared to sweep flocculation for water with those characteristics. There were three types of trials: conventional Jar Test with raw water, with and without filtration, and in a pilot Water Treatment Plant, direct downward filtration, with synthetic water. Auxiliary equipment such as Continuous Flocculation Monitoring Equipment (CFME) and image analysis were used to evaluate the growth of flocs. In the Jar Tests experiments, similar levels of color (61.49%) and turbidity (61.30%) removal were observed, with a lower dosage of coagulant (46 mg/L) in the charge neutralization mechanism compared to the ones with sweep flocculation (58.22% for color and 54.73% for turbidity removal with 52 mg/L of aluminium sulfate). Similar results were found on pilot plant. At filtration rates of 180 and 300 m3 m−2 day−1, sweep flocculation mechanism had shorter filtration cycle (<5 m3) compared to other mechanisms. Therefore, a change in the operation of Water Treatment plants that use a coagulant dosage associated with sweep flocculation can bring advantages such as the reduction of coagulant consumption and sludge productions, as well as the increase of chlorine disinfection and filtration cycles.

Highlights

  • Most of the water (≈69.2%) supplied to Brazilian municipalities is collected from shallow springs and treated using the conventional water treatment method [1], which includes coagulation and flocculation

  • Sweep flocculation is more broadly used in the conventional process, which prioritizes the sedimentation of large flocs formed by larger dosages of coagulant and coagulation pHs, while adsorption and charge neutralization is more broadly used in direct filtration, using lower dosages of coagulant and coagulation pHs, which are necessary for the formation of stronger microflocs, leading to improved filtration conditions [3,7,8]

  • Several recent studies have suggested that the charge neutralization mechanism is more effective in removing natural organic matter, usually characterized by high values of humic acid and apparent color in the coagulation, flocculation and decantation process [2,15,16,17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most of the water (≈69.2%) supplied to Brazilian municipalities is collected from shallow springs and treated using the conventional water treatment method [1], which includes coagulation and flocculation. Several recent studies have suggested that the charge neutralization mechanism is more effective in removing natural organic matter, usually characterized by high values of humic acid and apparent color in the coagulation, flocculation and decantation process [2,15,16,17]. Color removal would likely happen in a region of charge neutralization with Al(OH) species and/or highly charged polynuclear species This can be useful, especially when it is necessary to treat high color turbidity ratio water samples. Flocculation index can be used to aid monitoring and optimizing coagulation, flocculation and filtration conditions

Water Samples in the Study
Coagulant
Flocculation Index
Variables Correlation
Size and Shape of Particles
Experimental Procedures
Results and Discussions
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call