Abstract
The walls of some rooms of the Domus aurea in Rome (Italy) have several remarkable paintings of the Roman age, which are attributed by the archaeologists to a painter named Fabullus (Bor da 1958). This monument was opened to the visitors from 1950 to 1981, and during that time green crusts of biological nature developed on some frescoes. In order to stop the biodeterio ration, the incandescent lamps within the rooms were switched off. Nevertheless the crusts re mained and became larger and the frescoes were further damaged. At the request of the Istituto Centrale del Restauro of Rome we have carried out research in order to determine the charac teristics of the algal biocenosis that is growing on the walls with and without frescoes. For the investigation, we chose the eighty-fifth room of the Domus aurea where the relative hu midity approaches 95%, the temperature is ap proximately 18°C, and natural light intensity is less than 10 lux. The air comes from the outside through holes in the ceiling of the neighbouring room, since room 85 has no outside door. The artificial lighting previously used had an intensity of 145-150 lux at the surface with frescoes, and of 1 10 lux below the lamp on the walls without frescoes. Corresponding with the lighted areas there are several crusts, 1-2 mm deep, different in colour and causing different degrees of dete rioration. Samples were collected to the right (sample 1, blue-green), above (sample 2, dark green) and to the left of the lamp (sample 3, blue green). The last sample (sample 4, grey-brown) was taken below the lamp from an area without frescoes where the crust was hardly visible (Fig. 1). Samples 1 and 3 were soft and moist, while sample 4 was drier and rich in mineral compo nents. The various algal taxa were very difficult to identify in the fresh samples because of the compact structure formed by the com penetration of microorganisms and due to the necessity to squeeze the material in order to reveal the char acteristic structures of single organisms. Obser vations were made with a Leitz Laborlux D light microscope and a Leitz Orthoplan ft.uorescent microscope Ploemopak 2 with filter set 546 nm, and barrier filter 580 nm. Scanning electron mi croscopy was carried out by means of a Scan nosan EM on either fresh samples or fixed sam ples in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0. 1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 6.9, dehydrated, critical point dried with CO2 and gold coated (Favali et al 1978). For cultures, 0.2 g of each sample were ground to a powder, suspended in 0.9% NaCI to a final volume of 10 ml and kept for 24 h at 18°C and 150 lux of light intensity (the correspondent PAR was 2.7 JLmol m-2 S-I). From this suspension I ml was inoculated onto a double series of Petri dishes containing the following media: BD (Bas lerova & Dvorakova 1962), BG 11 (Stanier et al 1971), Detmer (Tomaselli et al 1979), Kolkwitz (Tomaselli et aI1979), AN (Albertano et aI 1979), and BN (Albertano et aI1979). The cultures were
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.