Abstract

As process technology scales, electronic devices become more susceptible to soft errors. Soft errors can lead to silent data corruptions (SDCs), seriously compromising the reliability of a system. Researchers have explored error resilient encodings, which leverage crash patterns to detect SDCs. Despite its importance, much still remains to be determined regarding how errors propagate to cause SDCs or crashes. Understanding error propagation patterns could lead to more efficient implementation of error detection. An experimental study of program behavior in the presence of faulty instruction encoding under the IA-32 architecture is described in this study. Extensive fault injection experiments including over 70,000 faults were conducted, targeting all fields of instruction encoding. The analysis of the obtained data shows the following: (1) If the alignment of an instruction sequence is not preserved after injection, it causes crashes in a high probability (93.2%). (2) The SDC rate of an alignment-preserved category is close to that of a typical data injection. The SDC-prone fields include the opcode field, reg field, and immediate field. (3) Several crash patterns, such as violation of calling conventions, are revealed to extend the detection methods. These findings help us identify the vulnerable parts of instruction encoding, which need to be protected against soft errors. By applying the implications provided by the findings, we discuss feasible modifications, including swapping reg encodings, to reduce SDC rate, thus increasing the resilience of instruction set to soft errors.

Highlights

  • Soft error has emerged as a severe challenge in electronic system design [1]

  • By applying the implications provided by the findings, we discuss feasible modifications, including swapping reg encodings, to reduce silent data corruption (SDC) rate, increasing the resilience of instruction set to soft errors

  • We show differences between the addressing modes in the original instructions and instructions with changed encoding by comparing the base register or index register used for memory addressing in Figure 7. e base register and index register for a specific instruction can be queried in its data trace. 81.6% of the original instructions involve accessing EBP or ESP for addressing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soft error has emerged as a severe challenge in electronic system design [1]. Progressive technology scaling and lowering of operating voltages have made contemporary and future electronic systems more susceptible to soft errors [2]. Soft errors can produce a bit flip in the instruction encoding flipping a single bit from 0 to 1 or vice versa. Possible outcome types derived from this bit flip are benign, crash, hang, or silent data corruption (SDC) [3]. When SDC occurs, the program generates an erroneous output. Compared with other outcome types, SDC is more insidious since it occurs without any indications [4]. Applying the erroneous output incurred by SDC may lead to loss of properties and even casualties

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call