Abstract

Wettability alteration is one of the most important mechanisms of surfactant flooding. In this work, the combined Amott/USBM (United States Bureau of Mines) method was applied to study the average wettability alteration of initially neutral cores after viscoelastic-surfactant (VES) filtration. The effects of static aging, dynamic aging, VES concentration, filtration flow rate, and pore radius on the alteration of a core’s average wettability were studied. The wettability-alteration trends measured by Amott and USBM were consistent, demonstrating that the overall hydrophilicity of the core was enhanced after VES filtration. The wettability alterations of the core brought about by dynamic aging were more significant than by static aging. The viscoelastic properties of the VES played an important role in altering the wettability. In addition, the ability of the VES to affect the core’s wettability was significantly enhanced when the VES concentration was increased, which was beneficial in increasing VES adsorption on the pore-wall surface, thus altering the overall wettability of the core. Increasing filtration flow rates can destroy those high-viscosity VES aggregates via the higher shear rate. A higher retention of VES makes the core more hydrophilic. The difference in the wettability of cores with different pore radius after VES filtration was not significant. The alteration of average wettability caused by VES in porous media provides a new vision for studying the EOR mechanism of VES.

Highlights

  • The wettability of rock is considered to be one of the most important parameters affecting the efficiency of surfactant flooding [1]

  • Amott/USBM method to measure core wettability, and the results showed that this comAmott and USBM

  • The Amott index and the USBM index were significantly increased after VES filtration and aging

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The wettability of rock is considered to be one of the most important parameters affecting the efficiency of surfactant flooding [1]. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) can be achieved by filtrating a low-concentration surfactant solution to alter the reservoir wettability to be more hydrophilic [2], which can affect residual oil saturation and distribution in pores [3]. Wettability alteration of rock is affected by rock minerals, reservoir fluid properties, and saturation history [4]. The wettability of rock can be determined qualitatively and quantitatively [3,5,6,7,8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call