Abstract
Characteristics of Integrated Territorial Investments in Romania
Highlights
The programming period 2014 - 2020 was grounded in a context where the European Union is facing major crises at both economic and social level as well as failures such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, relationship withTurkey, Brexit etc
A report on new territorial development tools in cohesion policy 2014-2020 (2016) mention that there will be a number of major challanges for the member states, namely the technical and operational capacity of the local actors, the fact that there is no expertise for such a tool, the possibility of generating a dual subordination between local actors and central entities, and not least, the possibility of noticing discrepancies regarding the local implementation strategy, programmatic policies at operational program level, and the visions of implementation of other stakeholders
We identified a number of elements that prove a major discrepancy between the different visions concerning the implementation of integrated territorial investments (ITI) in Romania
Summary
The programming period 2014 - 2020 was grounded in a context where the European Union is facing major crises at both economic and social level as well as failures such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, relationship with. In the Territorial of the European Union 2020 (2011), it is mentioned that territorial approaches are based on local know-how, on local control of resources, and an implementation framework adapted to the specific characteristics of the territory Under these circumstances, the programming period 2014-2020 integrates a number of innovative tools of territorial development, as follows: local development places under community-led responsibility and integrated territorial investments (ITI). A report on new territorial development tools in cohesion policy 2014-2020 (2016) mention that there will be a number of major challanges for the member states, namely the technical and operational capacity of the local actors, the fact that there is no expertise for such a tool, the possibility of generating a dual subordination between local actors and central entities, and not least, the possibility of noticing discrepancies regarding the local implementation strategy, programmatic policies at operational program level, and the visions of implementation of other stakeholders
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call