Abstract
Recent developments in exoplanetary research highlight the importance of Love numbers in understanding the internal dynamics, formation, migration history, and potential habitability of exoplanets. Love numbers represent crucial parameters that gauge how exoplanets respond to external forces such as tidal interactions and rotational effects. By measuring these responses, insights into the internal structure, composition, and density distribution of exoplanets can be gained. The rate of apsidal precession of a planetary orbit is directly linked to the second-order fluid Love numbers. Thus, Love numbers can also offer valuable insights into the mass distribution of a planet. In this context, we aim to re-determine the orbital parameters of WASP-43b - in particular, the orbital period, eccentricity, and argument of the periastron - and its orbital evolution. We study the outcomes of the tidal interaction with the host star in order to identify whether tidal decay and periastron precession occur in the system. We observed WASP-43b with HARPS, whose data we present for the first time, and we also analysed the newly acquired JWST full-phase light curve. We jointly fit new and archival radial velocity and transit and occultation mid-times, including tidal decay, periastron precession, and long-term acceleration in the system. We detected a tidal decay rate of dot P _a= (-1.99±0.50) ms yr^-1 and a periastron precession rate of )^∘ d^-1 = (621.72 ^ This is the first time that both periastron precession and tidal decay are simultaneously detected in an exoplanetary system. The observed tidal interactions can neither be explained by the tidal contribution to apsidal motion of a non-aligned stellar or planetary rotation axis nor by assuming a non-synchronous rotation for the planet, and a value for the planetary Love number cannot be derived. Moreover, we excluded the presence of a second body (e.g. a distant companion star or a yet undiscovered planet) down to a planetary mass of ≳0.3 M_J and up to an orbital period of lesssim 3,700 days. We leave the question of the cause of the observed apsidal motion open.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have