Abstract

Representations of literary history follow the rules of serialism, onedimensionality, and continuity: First of all, the texts are presented as chronologically successive and, secondly, as characteristic of the respective epoch; thirdly, the texts are presented in such a way that a specific text—or a specific group of texts—derives logically, genetically, and harmoniously from another text or group of texts. It is obvious that this philological construction cannot be applied to any literature as differently structured as medieval Latin literature, which is organized mainly in relation to ancient-pagan, biblical, and patristic models. Due to the intrinsically meta-epochal layout of Latin literature, it would be natural not to speak of the ‘Latin literature of the late Middle Ages,’ but rather—neutrally and exclusively chronologically—of the ‘Latin literature during the late Middle Ages.’. Keywords: late Middle Ages; Latin literature; literary history; philological construction

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.