Abstract
The mutual penetration of the charge density clouds should not be identified with the overlap of the corresponding wave functions in the strict sense of the notion. There are a lot of convincing experimental data evidencing a mutual compensation of the penetration and exchange effects by the overlap effect, and more strictly by the so-called contact covalency effect. This compensation effect was probably the reason of some earlier striking successes of the point charge model. An analogous effect makes the pseudopotential in metals so weak that the almost free-electron model works very well. The effective repulsion due to the Pauli exclusion counteracts the attractive potential acting on the metal ion electrons due to their penetration into the outer ligand shells. In general, the crystal field parameters of higher orders corrected for these effects are still far from their experimental values. It thus appears that important contributions to these parameters must also arise from mechanisms, which perturb the free-ion states.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.