Chapter 3 - Comparing and contrasting characterstics of coping and adpatation response

Abstract

The paper categorizes farmers' responses to climate change between coping and adaptation action. A qualitative content analysis using a hermeneutic approach was used for reviewing the literature. Farmers' response to climate change is conceptualized as comprising three dimensions—first, “conceptual understanding”; second, “progression of response”; and third, “linking short-term response to long-term response.” The analysis included 77 papers published during the period 2005 to 2019. The study's outcome shows that most of the studies included in this review focus on Africa (South Africa, Burkina Faso, and Ethiopia). The result elicits that the definitions of coping and adaptation differ, but practices remain undifferentiated. Characteristics and consensus between the terms “coping” and “adaptation” have also been highlighted. The study shows a progression in response from short-term action (coping) to long-term practices (adaptation). However, the low capability of households and frequent exposure often lead to maladaptation and the prevalence of traditional coping mechanisms. Insights from the review will help conceptualize and operationalize the term “coping” and “adaptation” practices for future studies.