Abstract

People experiencing homelessness with animals are often the subject of criticism and judgment. After all, if one cannot provide for themselves, why should they be allowed to care for another being? However, as research and experience reveal, wealth and even a physical house are not adequate measures for the quality of life of an animal. Moreover, the animal provides constant companionship, support, and sense of purpose for people experiencing homelessness. But the very thing that provides people with hope can also be a barrier in their ability to lift themselves out of homelessness. The “no-pets-allowed” culture within homeless services prevents devoted animal guardians from entering shelter and housing programs. When faced with the ultimatum of choosing their animals or shelter, people may often choose to remain on the streets. Clinicians working with clients experiencing homelessness with animals may find their clinical work delayed as they face additional challenges to eating, protecting themselves from the elements, and having a safe place to sleep. Consequently, a clinician in the service of a person who is homeless should expect to perform some case management tasks, or work very closely with a case manager, until the most elusive of all basic needs—shelter or housing—is secured.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.