Abstract
Globally, feather pecking and cannibalism create economic challenges for the producer and welfare challenges to poultry. Cannibalism may be an unfortunate side effect of uncontrolled feather pecking rather than a result of an aggressive encounter. Two primary types of feather pecking (gentle feather pecking and severe feather pecking) have been characterized in the scientific literature, both of which differ from aggressive pecking. Individual variations in brain morphology, stress responsivity, and genetics influence the development and perseverance of feather pecking. However, providing a consistent supply of quality litter, giving hens adequate access to perches, providing mashed food and nipple drinkers, and ensuring environmentally stable temperature, lighting, and air quality conditions may safeguard against the development of feather pecking. Once feather pecking begins, this behavior can be difficult to stop, so increasing our understanding of hen perception will identify strategies to prevent the development of this detrimental behavior.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
