Abstract
Clinicians are bound by two imperatives when they conduct assessments: the need to follow standardized administration practices and the need to alter standardized practices when assessing individuals with disabilities. Historically, research and recommendations for accommodations have directed clinicians to eliminate construct-irrelevant variance but failed to invoke the equally important imperative of retaining construct representation in the assessment. This chapter focuses on the elaboration of these competing imperatives—reducing construct-irrelevant variance while maintaining construct representation—and suggested a decision-making procedure for clinicians to follow when determining whether and how to accommodate clients with disabilities. The chapter also reviews research using the Wechsler scales with individuals who have disabilities. The reviews suggest four general conclusions. Although these conclusions have reasonable support from the research, it is essential to note that there are significant limitations to the strength of these conclusions for guiding clinical practice with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III and Wechsler Memory Scale-III.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Clinical Interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.