Abstract
The various types of electron-capture detectors (ECDs) that have been commercially available for pesticide residue work differ in ionizing source used, design of the detector cell, and the different modes of electrical stimulation and measurement, with each of these parameters having a profound effect on the performance of the ECD. Historically, there have been four types of ECDs commonly used in pesticide analysis—three utilizing radioactive sources and one non-radioactive source. Foils with 3 H imbedded in titanium were the only type available in the past years and, therefore, these have been the traditional source of β -particles which ionize the carrier gas, generally argon, helium or nitrogen, to produce electrons. The 3 HTi sources are characterized by high specific activities which resulted in a large standing current and increased sensitivity and linear range when compared to sources employing other radioisotopes. Because 3 H is easily lost from these foils the upper operational temperature limit is 225°C which results in the foil being extremely susceptible to contamination from gas chromatography (GC) column eluates. The d.c. mode of operation is also subject to instability and anomalous responses such that the d.c. mode characteristically exhibited drifting baselines, sensitivity variations, and limited dynamic range.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.