Changes in US health care provider attitudes related to contraceptive safety before and after the release of National Guidance

Lauren B Zapata,Isabel A Morgan,Kathryn M Curtis,Suzanne G Folger,Maura K Whiteman

doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.142

Lauren B Zapata, Isabel A Morgan + Show 3 more

Open Access

PDF Available

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.142

Copy DOI

Export

Save

Cite

Abstract
Full-Text PDF
Similar Papers

Abstract

Listen

ObjectiveThe US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (USMEC) is the first national guidance containing evidence-based recommendations for contraception. We describe provider attitudes about contraceptive safety before and after the 2010 USMEC release. Study designWe conducted two cross-sectional mailed surveys using different nationwide samples of office-based physicians and Title X clinic providers before (2009–2010) and after (2013–2014) the USMEC release. We compared the proportion of providers reporting select contraceptive methods as safe for women with specific characteristics or medical conditions before and after the USMEC release and conducted multivariable logistic regression to adjust for provider characteristics. ResultsFor the following select characteristics for which the USMEC classifies specific contraceptive methods as safe (Category 1 or 2), a significantly (p<.05) higher proportion of providers reported the method safe after versus before the USMEC release: intrauterine devices (IUDs) for adolescents (79.8% versus 60.2%), IUDs for women with HIV (72.4% versus 50.6%), depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for women with obesity (89.5% versus 76.1%), and DMPA for women with history of bariatric surgery (87.6% versus 73.9%). These differences remained significant after adjustment for provider characteristics. ConclusionsWhile we observed many positive changes in health care provider attitudes related to contraception safety after the USMEC release, gaps remain. Continuing education and evidence-based training for providers, and ensuring office and health center protocols address medical eligibility for contraception for the full range of characteristics included in the USMEC might bridge remaining gaps and increase delivery of high-quality contraception care. ImplicationsGaps between evidence and provider attitudes remain that can inform future efforts to improve contraceptive service delivery.

Full Text