Changes in subarctic vegetation after one century of land use and climate change

Jutta Kapfer,Ksenia Popova,Radim Hédl

doi:10.1111/jvs.12854

Abstract

AbstractQuestionsHave species richness and composition in subarctic vegetation changed over the past ca. 90 years? Are compositional shifts linked to changes in land management or climate? Are observed changes associated with vegetation type, life form, or habitat preference?LocationRybachy and Sredny Peninsulas, NW Russia.MethodsWe resurveyed vegetation ca. 90 years after the first sampling in 1927–1930 to study changes in species richness, abundance and composition. Because of missing plot‐related environmental measurements we used a weighted averaging approach calculating relative changes in species‐specific optimum values for different environmental gradients represented by species indicator values to identify compositional change in relation to the environment. Changes in species composition were visualised using detrended correspondence analyses. Significances of observed changes in species richness and frequency were evaluated using restricted permutation tests. A χ2 test was used to test if observed changes in abundances were related to species’ life form and habitat preferences.ResultsSpecies composition has changed significantly over the past ca. 90 years, as indicated by significant changes in species’ frequencies and values of optima for the environmental gradients temperature, moisture, nutrients and light. Species richness decreased significantly, in particular in nitrophilous and wet growing vegetation. Species typical for grazed grasslands and meadows and species of wet habitats became less abundant, while dwarf shrubs and forest species increased.ConclusionsLand abandonment, in combination with climate change, is likely to have caused the observed changes in the subarctic vegetation of NW Russia. Shifts in the species dominance ratios and interspecific competition (e.g. for reallocated nutrients) after land abandonment may have been promoted by the subsequent change towards a warmer climate, facilitating the regrowth of previously open meadows with grazing‐intolerant tall herbs, forest herbs and dwarf shrubs. This study illustrates clearly the long‐term effects of land‐use change, the consequences of which are still visible even after almost one century in the subarctic.

Highlights

IntroductionHuman activity has always had an impact on the environment by influencing directly (e.g. land use) or indirectly (e.g. climate change) on landscapes and their natural components
Human activity has always had an impact on the environment by influencing directly or indirectly on landscapes and their natural components
As significant changes were identified for species regardless of vegetation type, our results indicate an overall compositional turnover at the study

Summary

Introduction

Human activity has always had an impact on the environment by influencing directly (e.g. land use) or indirectly (e.g. climate change) on landscapes and their natural components. Numerous studies demonstrate that recent climate warming has driven species’ geographic distributions polewards (Forbes, Fauria, & Zetterberg, 2010; Myers-Smith et al, 2011; Sturm, Racine, & Tape, 2001; Tape, Sturm, & Racine, 2006) or up the elevational gradient (Chen, Hill, Ohlemüller, Roy, & Thomas, 2011; Lenoir & Svenning, 2010; Steinbauer et al, 2018) resulting in significant changes in species composition, diversity and structure (Savage & Vellend, 2014; Walther, 2010). Land-use change as a direct influence on landscapes has caused a worldwide decline in species diversity and ecosystem services (Pereira et al, 2010; Tscharntke, Klein, Kruess, SteffanDewenter, & Thies, 2005). In Northern Europe, North Fennoscandia, where traditional pastoralism has decreased strongly, studies on land-use change impacts on vegetation are rare (but see e.g. Persson, 1984) and long-term mutual relationships with climate are not fully understood (Newton et al, 2009)

Methods

Findings

Discussion

Conclusion