Abstract

<p indent="0mm">The Chang’E-5 (CE-5) mission successfully returned <sc>1731 g</sc> of lunar soil samples from the northeast of the Oceanus Procellarum. The newly returned lunar soil can provide a new ground truth for the quantitative inversion of lunar remote sensing data. In this study, the mineral and chemical compositions (FeO, TiO<sub>2</sub>, Th) of the landing region were obtained from the remote sensing data and compared with the laboratory analysis results of the CE-5 lunar soil samples. The differences between them (especially the olivine content) indicate that there is still room for improvement in the methods for retrieving the elemental and mineral abundances using remote sensing data. Through a systematic comparative analysis, we discovered that: (1) the geochemical characteristics of high FeO, medium TiO<sub>2</sub>, and abundant Th in the CE-5 lunar soil are significantly different from the existing Apollo lunar soil, which can provide unique ground truth for remote sensing research; (2) The CE-5 lunar soil represents mature lunar soil developed on the young basalt unit on the moon, with a small proportion of distantly sourced ejecta, representing the mare basalt composition characteristics of the landing region; (3) The CE-5 lunar soil is very fine, which meets the sample standard <sc>(&lt;45 μm)</sc> of the Lunar Soil Characterization Consortium for providing ground truth. Notably, the CE-5 landing region also exhibits unique characteristics: (1) it is located in the mid-latitude region on the western hemisphere of the moon, different from the low-latitude region where the United States and the Soviet Union sample return missions landed; (2) it is located on the late-stage lunar basalt unit; it is different from the existing spectral calibration area. Therefore, the construction of the CE-5 landing area as a new remote sensing calibration site based on the measured data of its lunar soil can significantly expand the geographical scope and global representation of the lunar calibration sites. Based on the results of the remote sensing and sample studies, we delineate the calibration area in the unit where the CE-5 landing site is located (Em4), thus providing a reference for establishing a remote sensing calibration area in the future.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call