Abstract

Abstract The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences. This purpose rises from our will to contribute to the debate about the scientificity of such topics. After providing an overview of the most authoritative scholars who have broached the issue, an attempt will be made to propose an alternative answer through scientific computational research, that is neural networks.

Highlights

  • The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences

  • In the light of the individualistic approach as a methodology for social sciences it is impossible to grant the objectivity belonging to the positum to the social action

  • While considering the Humian theory concerning the limitation of human knowledge, this dichotomy is not to be set aside, but rather interpreted following John Stuart Mill: it is impossible to leave aside the unforeseen element, which is the essential component of every human action, that is liberty

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main purpose of this paper is to identify lawlike regularities inside social sciences. Social sciences aim at tracing the actors’ interactions back to the emerging facts, starting from beliefs, arrangements and personal wishes that affect human actions.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call