Abstract

This paper investigates the use of stance linguistic features in accounting Ph.D. theses in a Nigerian university. We adopted a mixed-methods approach by combining a textual analysis of the theses and explored the context of writing of the participants similar to Swale’s textography approach. We compiled three corpora: Bayero University corpus of six accounting Ph.D. theses (BUK corpus); a United Kingdom corpus of six accounting PhD theses (UK corpus) and a corpus of eleven journal articles of accounting (JAA corpus). The results of textual analysis indicate that there is a higher frequency of hedges in all the three corpora than other stance features, followed by boosters, then attitudinal markers, and explicit self-mention features. One striking finding from the BUK corpus is that the authors are rarely used self-mention features compared to authors from other two corpora. However, the result of the chi-square indicates that the differences among the three corpora’s use of stance features are insignificant. The contextual data suggests that non-teaching of English for specific purposes and the traditional practices of Bayero University might be some of the possible factors that constrained authors’ use of stance linguistic features. We recommend introduction of teaching English for specific purposes on postgraduate programmes in Nigerian universities.

Highlights

  • The importance of disciplinary discourses, epistemology and linguistic features vary across disciplines, genres, and context has been discussed (Becher 1987b; Becher & Trowler, 2001; Thompson 2001; Swales, 1990, 1998: Hyland, 2007, 2005c; & Widdowson, 1998). Fairclough, (1992a) states that socio-cultural factors may enable or constrain the production and reception of a discourse

  • In the light of this, this study aims to investigate what stance linguistic features are frequently used in Ph.D. theses in a Nigerian university

  • We first present the results of textual analysis of Bayero University’s theses, and present the comparative corpus-based analysis of all the three corpora, aiming at exploring more explanations regarding the use of stance linguistic features within the discipline of accounting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The importance of disciplinary discourses, epistemology and linguistic features vary across disciplines, genres, and context has been discussed (Becher 1987b; Becher & Trowler, 2001; Thompson 2001; Swales, 1990, 1998: Hyland, 2007, 2005c; & Widdowson, 1998). Fairclough, (1992a) states that socio-cultural factors may enable or constrain the production and reception of a discourse. The importance of disciplinary discourses, epistemology and linguistic features vary across disciplines, genres, and context has been discussed (Becher 1987b; Becher & Trowler, 2001; Thompson 2001; Swales, 1990, 1998: Hyland, 2007, 2005c; & Widdowson, 1998). Many research studies of stance linguistic features have been conducted across genres, disciplines, including cross-cultural studies. A research on the discipline of accounting regarding use of stance linguistic features has not been reported in Ph.D. theses in Nigerian context. We have argued that the construction of knowledge, and linguistic features vary across disciplines, and that social contexts may enable or constrain the production and reception of a discourse. We investigate what stance linguistic features are frequently used by accounting Ph.D. authors in their theses at Bayero University

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call