Abstract
Coral reefs are highly endangered ecosystems. The identification and quantification of potential stress factors are essential to protect them. UV filters from sunscreens that are introduced to coral reef areas are considered as one of these stressors and their impact on corals needs to be further investigated. Even though UV filters are functionally similar, their structural features are very diverse. Their impact on limnic organisms have also been shown to be highly variable ranging from no or low to high toxicity. It is therefore to be expected that their effect on corals also differs significantly and that each compound has to be evaluated individually. The demand for conclusive benchmarks and guidelines from policy makers and the public over the past years shows the necessity for an objective literature review on the effects of various UV filters on scleractinian corals. Here, we review the present literature, summarize the data on the different UV filters and discuss the different approaches, advantages and limitations of the studies. However, the methods used in the latter studies vary greatly. They differ in many aspects such as species and life stage used, field and laboratory approaches, with exposure times ranging from hours to weeks. Some studies include analytics and measure the actual test concentration, others only provide nominal concentrations. The lack of standardized methods renders comparisons between studies futile. Additionally, most UV filters have only been investigated in a single or a few studies of different quality. Reliable thresholds are therefore impossible to draw on the basis of currently available studies. Nevertheless, certain UV filters repeatedly showed comparable toxicity in both freshwater and marine species tested. Yet, existing differences in results from coral tests emphasize the need for a standardized testing method comparable to those established for other aquatic organisms in order to allow for a more conclusive assessment. In this review, we describe what a scientifically sound testing proposal should include in order to obtain reliable and reproducible data, which ultimately should result in an internationally organized standardized ring test trial. Such standardized toxicity tests would enable validation of coral toxicity data related to UV filters, but also testing of other types of compounds that are known to be introduced and effect coral reefs, thus helping to identify significant stressors and enabling objective policy decisions.
Highlights
Scleractinian corals are the bioengineers of the most diverse marine ecosystem – coral reefs
Despite growing knowledge of their socio-economic value by providing ecosystem services to around 10% of world’s population (Darling et al, 2019), coral reefs remain threatened mainly due to anthropogenic disturbances: the average loss of coral reefs within the last 40 years has been estimated at 20–50% and a further decline is expected for the rest of this century (Hughes et al, 2003, 2017b; Bruno and Selig, 2007; Ateweberhan et al, 2011; De’ath et al, 2012; Jackson et al, 2014)
Coral reefs, which are often termed the tropical rainforest of the oceans, harbor 25% of the marine biodiversity and provide ecosystem services to over 500 million people
Summary
Scleractinian corals are the bioengineers of the most diverse marine ecosystem – coral reefs. Standardization of testing protocols is mandatory to allow an equal assessment of substances such as UV filters within national chemical registration processes, but requires considerably more effort and time compared to typical scientific research This validation process relies at first on a scientifically sound testing proposal, and second, on reproducible results obtained from internationally organized ring tests. It is possible to use natural seawater from temperate or other regions when conducting coral experiments It should only be used with sufficient knowledge on water quality chemistry, since certain parameters potentially need to be adjusted. On a chronic test level, sublethal endpoints such as growth, bleaching or other population relevant aspects may be suitable additional measurements It should be taken into account, that the observation of effect levels might be easier at the larval compared to the adult coral stage (colony). Tissue analysis from standardized lab tests with constant exposure concentrations will certainly help to solve this merit
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.