Abstract
Cetacean (whale, dolphin, and porpoise) remains are occasionally encountered at Roman and medieval sites in London and are regularly the topic of medieval historical sources. These sources are often concerned with whale strandings and the subsequent claims on the carcass by the king, queen, or other members of the nobility or clergy with jurisdiction over the coastline that the whale stranded upon. The meat stripped from the carcasses was regularly transported to London and cetaceans have therefore been ascribed as a “high-status food source”. Besides, strandings, several historical sources also suggest that active whaling was undertaken, and that meat was sold at several London markets. Based on these historical sources it however remains unclear to what extent active whaling was undertaken, and which species were exploited.Zooarchaeological studies address whales and their role in Roman and medieval society more directly through the study of animal bones. This study combines historical sources and the identification of zooarchaeological cetacean remains from the London sites of Bermondsey Abbey, Westminster Abbey (cellarium), Winchester Palace, Vintry, St Peter’s Hill, and Trig Lane through Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) and morphological analysis. The historical and zooarchaeological evidence from London indicates that cetacean meat was indeed associated with a high-status diet, in particular the ecclesiastical diet, though some form of commercialization of cetacean meat also took place. On occasion, whale bone was used for the creation of bone artefacts or tools, primarily during the Middle Saxon period. Additionally, it is suggested that active whaling might occasionally have been undertaken, potentially already from the Middle Saxon period onwards. However, the majority of the remains were probably acquired through opportunistic scavenging of stranded individuals.
Highlights
IntroductionEven though several studies have attempted to fill a gap in our knowledge regarding the early exploitation of cetaceans by analysing zooarchaeological cetacean remains (Mulville, 2002; Speller et al, 2016; Rodrigues et al, 2018; van den Hurk, 2020), many zooarchaeo logical specimens remain unstudied
Cetaceans have been understudied in the field of zooarchaeology for years
No Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) was performed on this specimen
Summary
Even though several studies have attempted to fill a gap in our knowledge regarding the early exploitation of cetaceans by analysing zooarchaeological cetacean remains (Mulville, 2002; Speller et al, 2016; Rodrigues et al, 2018; van den Hurk, 2020), many zooarchaeo logical specimens remain unstudied. This is the case for Roman and medieval London (see Table 1 for the periodization considered as part of this study), for which several cetacean remains have been uncovered from archaeological contexts. Throughout this study the term whale will be used as a general term for all cetaceans, unless specific references to whales as being distinct from dolphins and porpoises is made
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have