Abstract
Sequel to J. de Hoz: 2002: “Grafitos ceramicos griegos y punicos en la Hispania prerromana”, AEspA 75, 75-91. After some generalities about graffiti (§ 1), the following categories are studied: graffiti of the south of Hispania, with emphasis on chronological problems, (§ 2), Iberian graffiti (§ 3), distinction, some times difficult, of owner graffiti and trade marks (§ 4) and problems of ethnic identity posed by graffiti (§ 5). The addendum considers some Phoenician data discovered after 2002.
Highlights
Sequel to J. de Hoz: 2002: “Grafitos cerámicos griegos y púnicos en la Hispania prerromana”, AEspA 75, 75-91
After some generalities about graffiti (§ 1), the following categories are studied: graffiti of the south of Hispania, with emphasis on chronological problems, (§ 2), Iberian graffiti (§ 3), distinction, some times difficult, of owner graffiti and trade marks (§ 4) and problems of ethnic identity posed by graffiti (§ 5)
511-8. 2005: “La práctica de escribir entre los primeros fenicios peninsulares y la introducción de la escritura entre los pueblos paleohispánicos”, Actas IX, 155-92
Summary
Sequel to J. de Hoz: 2002: “Grafitos cerámicos griegos y púnicos en la Hispania prerromana”, AEspA 75, 75-91. After some generalities about graffiti (§ 1), the following categories are studied: graffiti of the south of Hispania, with emphasis on chronological problems, (§ 2), Iberian graffiti (§ 3), distinction, some times difficult, of owner graffiti and trade marks (§ 4) and problems of ethnic identity posed by graffiti (§ 5). The addendum considers some Phoenician data discovered after 2002. PALABRAS CLAVE: epigrafía, grafitos, lenguas paleohispánicas, cerámica, cronología, historia económica
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
