Abstract

The paper highlights the impact of excessive industrialization during the centralized economy era on urban spatial identity, as well as the disruption of this identity through political-administrative decisions, a phenomenon characteristic of the Central and Eastern European region during the era of centralized economies. The tendency to rebalance urban territorial systems is achieved through deindustrialization, together with reindustrialization and tertiarization. All these changes affect functionality, physiognomy as well as urban culture, and can be quantified through the changes in the memory of places. Urban toponyms related to industrialization are disappearing and are replaced by toponyms that illustrate the historical past of the city and, in general, its spatial identity. The paper aims to contribute to the development of research on the impact of oversized industrialization on the memory of places, in the context of the transition from industrial to service-based economies, a process that affected the states of the former Communist Bloc after 1990. Based on bibliographic sources and field research conducted between 2008 and 2020 in two cities in Romania (Bucharest, the country’s capital, and Galați, the largest river and seaport and the main centre of the steel industry in the country), we have evaluated quantitatively these changes with the help of indices resulting from the toponymic changes resulting from these processes. The study shows that the functional disturbances due to the oversized industrialization that characterized the communist period only managed to a small extent to affect the correlation between the spatial identity of the two cities and their toponymy.

Highlights

  • The large-scale industrialization of the centralized economy has left deep marks on the physiognomy and urban functionality of the Central and Eastern European states.The development of the industrial objectives has exceeded the support space potential of cities, through over-reaching inter-industrial relations, a fact that imprinted on the urban territorial systems a high degree of vulnerability [1]

  • The purpose of this study is to provide an analysis of how the oversized industrialization of the centralized economy period changed the urban toponymy, influencing the memory of places

  • The present study aims to develop the state of current knowledge on the relationships between the trajectory of urban industrial evolution and the causes that influence these trajectories on the one hand, and on the other hand, the reflection of industrial trajectories in the urban culture and in the memory of urban places, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The development of the industrial objectives has exceeded the support space potential of cities, through over-reaching inter-industrial relations, a fact that imprinted on the urban territorial systems a high degree of vulnerability [1]. Their susceptibility stood out once centralized economic systems collapsed, when the former communist states were confronted with a strong process of deindustrialization, followed, in some cases, by reindustrialization in other areas and on other scales, in accordance with the regional identity of spaces in which urban centres had evolved. Its main features can be summarized as follows: Mimicking the Soviet-Stalinist political model as a paradigm of change, establishing the dictatorship of the communist party, abolishing other parties and the parliamentary system.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call