Central and regional hemodynamic effects and neurohumoral consequences of minoxidil in severe congestive heart failure and comparison to hydralazine and nitroprusside

Abstract

Minoxidil is a potent oral vasodilator of potential value in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), although preliminary studies show that it causes fluid retention. To test whether minoxidil acts primarily as an arterial vasodilator in CHF, it was compared with hydralazine and nitroprusside. To evaluate its chronic efficacy and mechanism of fluid retention, the effects of minoxidil (7 patients) were compared, in a double-blind manner, with those of hydralazine (8 patients) on central and regional hemodynamics and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems. There was no demonstrable difference in the central hemodynamic effects of minoxidil and hydralazine in the dosages used. After 6 hours both drugs increased cardiac index (minoxidil group, from 1.65 ± 0.29 to 2.26 ± 0.40 liters /min/m 2, p < 0.0001; hydralazine group, from 1.88 ± 0.61 to 2.34 ± 0.90 liters/min/m 2, p < 0.0001), decreased systemic vascular resistance and increased heart rate without change in pulmonary arterial, pulmonary capillary wedge or right atrial pressures. Nitroprusside effects differed from those of minoxidil and hydralazine with respect to heart rate (p < 0.005) and mean pulmonary arterial (p < 0.007) and right atrial (p < 0.009) pressures. Nitroprusside also decreased relative hepatomesenteric flow compared with the other 2 agents (p < 0.005). Neither renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate, filtration fraction, nor urinary sodium excretion were significantly altered acutely by any of the 3 drugs. Minoxidil and hydralazine did not differ in their neurohumoral effects: Both agents produced an increase in plasma norepinephrine concentration (p < 0.003) and plasma renin activity (p < 0.04), but no change in plasma epinephrine or aldosterone concentrations. After 1 week of double-blind therapy, fluid retention was a greater problem with minoxidil than with hydralazine. Thus, minoxidil behaves primarily as an arterial vasodilator in CHF, fluid retention is a severe adverse effect, and the greater degree of fluid retention with minoxidil than hydralazine is not attributable to differing acute effects on total renal blood flow or function, or differing effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone or sympathetic nervous systems.